Decision intelligence for design teams

Never losethe whybehindthe work.

The Intent Ledger turns project conversations into a living, source-backed record of decisions, risk, and design intent.

Decision

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

Source

Structure's confirmed — the stair can land directly on the existing mezzanine, no extra steel needed.

Recurring risk

South-facing curtain wall may still cause glare on the working studio floor without a shading strategy.

Session 4 · Facade and Programme Coordination Review

Okay, let's start with the stair — did structure get back to us on the mezzanine tie-in?

Yeah, I heard back this morning.

Structure's confirmed — the stair can land directly on the existing mezzanine, no extra steel needed.

Good, that's one less thing hanging over us.

Can we lock the north-light roof profile too? That hasn't changed since concept, right?

Correct, still holding — the roof stays as approved.

This is the third time we've flagged the glare and we still don't have a shading answer.

I know, I know. We keep saying we'll come back to it.

Let's actually get a shading concept on paper before the glazing package goes out.

Separate thing — if the café's open to the public, does it need its own entrance separate from the studio?

Good question, I don't think we've confirmed that with the client yet.

Let's flag it and follow up before the next review.

Source · becomes intelligence
Decision

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

Carry the confirmed stair position into the next set of coordinated drawings.

Recurring risk · 3 sessions

South-facing curtain wall may still cause glare on the working studio floor without a shading strategy.

Send updated loading diagrams to the structural engineer for mezzanine tie-in sign-off.
ILM Record · Riverside Studio Expansion
Meeting Focus

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

Current Direction

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

+1 more

Active Tension

More studio floor vs. Larger review space

Attention

2

1 risk · 1 unresolved

Next Moves

1

ILM Record · Facade and Programme Coordination Review
Meeting Focus

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

Current Direction

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

+1 more

Active Tension

More studio floor vs. Larger review space

Attention

2

1 risk · 1 unresolved

Next Moves

1

ILM 01 · Concept Coordination Kickoff
Project Memory as of ILM 01

Read the map from left to right: project context → direction and decisions → delivery and actions → commitments and outcomes.

More ILM Records will add more project context to this map.

Project Memory

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Design Intent

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

1 card · 1 type

Design Intent· Medium

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The team agreed the new studio wing should not compete visually with the original pavilion building.

Recommendation

Use this as a filter for massing, material, and roofline decisions through the rest of the project.

High confidence

Source
This should feel like it was always meant to sit behind the pavilion, not next to it.
Direction & Decisions
1 item

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

Decision

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

1 card · 1 type

Decision· High

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

The client confirmed the expansion should run along the river edge, keeping the existing courtyard open.

Recommendation

Update the site plan and massing study to reflect the eastern-edge footprint.

High confidence

Source
Let's keep the courtyard as it is and push the new studio along the river edge instead.
Principles
1 item

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Design Intent

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

1 card · 1 type

Design Intent· Medium

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The team agreed the new studio wing should not compete visually with the original pavilion building.

Recommendation

Use this as a filter for massing, material, and roofline decisions through the rest of the project.

High confidence

Source
This should feel like it was always meant to sit behind the pavilion, not next to it.

Interrupts the current flow

Risks and unresolved questions sit here because they can interrupt the project's current direction.

Risks
1 item

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

Risk

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

1 card · 1 type

Risk· High

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

Early massing puts a full-height glazed wall on the south elevation, directly facing the main desks.

Recommendation

Model glare at midday and late afternoon before committing to the glazing extent.

Moderate confidence

Source
That much south glass right at desk height is going to be a problem by early afternoon.
Unresolved
1 item

Whether the new stair connects directly into the existing mezzanine is still open.

Clarification

Whether the new stair connects directly into the existing mezzanine is still open.

1 card · 1 type

Clarification· Medium

Whether the new stair connects directly into the existing mezzanine is still open.

The team raised a direct stair-to-mezzanine connection but did not confirm feasibility with structure yet.

Recommendation

Check with the structural engineer before the next coordination session.

Moderate confidence

Source
Can the new stair actually land on the existing mezzanine, or does that need its own structure?
ILM 02 · Structural Feasibility Check-in
Project Memory as of ILM 02

Read the map from left to right: project context → direction and decisions → delivery and actions → commitments and outcomes.

Project Memory

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Design Intent

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

1 card · 1 type

Design Intent· Medium

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The team agreed the new studio wing should not compete visually with the original pavilion building.

Recommendation

Use this as a filter for massing, material, and roofline decisions through the rest of the project.

High confidence

Source
This should feel like it was always meant to sit behind the pavilion, not next to it.
Direction & Decisions
1 item

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

Decision

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

1 card · 1 type

Decision· High

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

The client confirmed the expansion should run along the river edge, keeping the existing courtyard open.

Recommendation

Update the site plan and massing study to reflect the eastern-edge footprint.

High confidence

Source
Let's keep the courtyard as it is and push the new studio along the river edge instead.
Commitments / Outcomes
1 item

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

Commitment

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

1 card · 1 type

Commitment· Medium

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

The structural engineer agreed to check whether the existing mezzanine can take the new stair connection.

Recommendation

Follow up if loading diagrams have not arrived before the next session.

High confidence

Source
I'll run the numbers on the existing mezzanine and confirm whether it can take the new stair.
Principles
1 item

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Design Intent

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

1 card · 1 type

Design Intent· Medium

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The team agreed the new studio wing should not compete visually with the original pavilion building.

Recommendation

Use this as a filter for massing, material, and roofline decisions through the rest of the project.

High confidence

Source
This should feel like it was always meant to sit behind the pavilion, not next to it.

Interrupts the current flow

Risks and unresolved questions sit here because they can interrupt the project's current direction.

Risks
1 item

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

Evidence

2 cards

2 cards · 1 type

Risk· High

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

Early massing puts a full-height glazed wall on the south elevation, directly facing the main desks.

Recommendation

Model glare at midday and late afternoon before committing to the glazing extent.

Moderate confidence

Source
That much south glass right at desk height is going to be a problem by early afternoon.
Risk· High

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

The glare concern from the kickoff session was raised again — no shading strategy has been proposed yet.

Recommendation

Bring a shading concept to the next client-facing review.

Moderate confidence

Source
We still haven't solved the glazing glare from last time — it's still sitting there unresolved.
Unresolved
2 items

Whether the new stair connects directly into the existing mezzanine is still open.

Evidence

2 cards

2 cards · 2 types

Clarification· Medium

Whether the new stair connects directly into the existing mezzanine is still open.

The team raised a direct stair-to-mezzanine connection but did not confirm feasibility with structure yet.

Recommendation

Check with the structural engineer before the next coordination session.

Moderate confidence

Source
Can the new stair actually land on the existing mezzanine, or does that need its own structure?
Contradiction· High

Conflicting recollection of the cladding material decision.

One teammate recalls timber cladding being agreed; another recalls pre-weathered zinc from an earlier call.

Recommendation

Confirm the actual decision with the client before the next material review.

Moderate confidence

Source
I thought we'd already landed on timber for the cladding.
ILM 03 · Client Material Review
Project Memory as of ILM 03

Read the map from left to right: project context → direction and decisions → delivery and actions → commitments and outcomes.

Project Memory

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Design Intent

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

1 card · 1 type

Design Intent· Low

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The zinc cladding choice was checked back against the earlier quiet-infrastructure intent and confirmed to support it.

Recommendation

Keep this principle as the standing filter for any later material or massing change.

High confidence

Source
Zinc still keeps this quiet next to the pavilion — that was the whole point.
Direction & Decisions
2 items

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

Evidence

2 cards

2 cards · 1 type

Decision· High

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

The client confirmed the expansion should run along the river edge, keeping the existing courtyard open.

Recommendation

Update the site plan and massing study to reflect the eastern-edge footprint.

High confidence

Source
Let's keep the courtyard as it is and push the new studio along the river edge instead.
Decision· High

Pre-weathered zinc confirmed as the primary cladding material.

The client reviewed both options and confirmed zinc, resolving the earlier cladding contradiction.

Recommendation

Reissue elevations and specification pages with the confirmed zinc panel module.

High confidence

Source
Let's go with the zinc — that's the one we actually approved.
Delivery / Actions
1 item

Update cladding specification and reissue elevations with the zinc panel module.

Action

Update cladding specification and reissue elevations with the zinc panel module.

1 card · 1 type

Action· Medium

Update cladding specification and reissue elevations with the zinc panel module.

The specification pages and elevation drawings still reference the earlier, unconfirmed cladding option.

Recommendation

Complete before the next design-stage submission.

High confidence

Source
We need the spec and elevations updated to match what was actually approved.
Commitments / Outcomes
1 item

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

Commitment

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

1 card · 1 type

Commitment· Medium

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

The structural engineer agreed to check whether the existing mezzanine can take the new stair connection.

Recommendation

Follow up if loading diagrams have not arrived before the next session.

High confidence

Source
I'll run the numbers on the existing mezzanine and confirm whether it can take the new stair.
Principles
1 item

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Evidence

2 cards

2 cards · 1 type

Design Intent· Medium

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The team agreed the new studio wing should not compete visually with the original pavilion building.

Recommendation

Use this as a filter for massing, material, and roofline decisions through the rest of the project.

High confidence

Source
This should feel like it was always meant to sit behind the pavilion, not next to it.
Design Intent· Low

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The zinc cladding choice was checked back against the earlier quiet-infrastructure intent and confirmed to support it.

Recommendation

Keep this principle as the standing filter for any later material or massing change.

High confidence

Source
Zinc still keeps this quiet next to the pavilion — that was the whole point.

Interrupts the current flow

Risks and unresolved questions sit here because they can interrupt the project's current direction.

Risks
1 item

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

Evidence

2 cards

2 cards · 1 type

Risk· High

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

Early massing puts a full-height glazed wall on the south elevation, directly facing the main desks.

Recommendation

Model glare at midday and late afternoon before committing to the glazing extent.

Moderate confidence

Source
That much south glass right at desk height is going to be a problem by early afternoon.
Risk· High

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

The glare concern from the kickoff session was raised again — no shading strategy has been proposed yet.

Recommendation

Bring a shading concept to the next client-facing review.

Moderate confidence

Source
We still haven't solved the glazing glare from last time — it's still sitting there unresolved.
Unresolved
1 item

Whether the new stair connects directly into the existing mezzanine is still open.

Clarification

Whether the new stair connects directly into the existing mezzanine is still open.

1 card · 1 type

Clarification· Medium

Whether the new stair connects directly into the existing mezzanine is still open.

The team raised a direct stair-to-mezzanine connection but did not confirm feasibility with structure yet.

Recommendation

Check with the structural engineer before the next coordination session.

Moderate confidence

Source
Can the new stair actually land on the existing mezzanine, or does that need its own structure?
Contradiction · Structural Feasibility Check-in→ resolved

Pre-weathered zinc confirmed as the primary cladding material.

Produced a downstream action in Client Material Review.

ILM 04 · Facade and Programme Coordination Review
Project Memory as of ILM 04

Read the map from left to right: project context → direction and decisions → delivery and actions → commitments and outcomes.

Project Memory

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Design Intent

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

1 card · 1 type

Design Intent· Low

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Reaffirmed once more while reviewing the near-final façade package — still the project's standing design intent.

Recommendation

Hold this principle through construction detailing, not just concept design.

High confidence

Source
Whatever we decide on the facade, it still needs to defer to the pavilion — that hasn't changed.
Direction & Decisions
3 items

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

Evidence

3 cards

3 cards · 1 type

Decision· High

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

The client confirmed the expansion should run along the river edge, keeping the existing courtyard open.

Recommendation

Update the site plan and massing study to reflect the eastern-edge footprint.

High confidence

Source
Let's keep the courtyard as it is and push the new studio along the river edge instead.
Decision· High

Pre-weathered zinc confirmed as the primary cladding material.

The client reviewed both options and confirmed zinc, resolving the earlier cladding contradiction.

Recommendation

Reissue elevations and specification pages with the confirmed zinc panel module.

High confidence

Source
Let's go with the zinc — that's the one we actually approved.
Decision· High

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

Structural sign-off closes the question first raised at the concept kickoff — the direct connection is feasible.

Recommendation

Carry the confirmed stair position into the next set of coordinated drawings.

High confidence

Source
Structure's confirmed — the stair can land directly on the existing mezzanine, no extra steel needed.
Delivery / Actions
2 items

Update cladding specification and reissue elevations with the zinc panel module.

Evidence

2 cards

2 cards · 1 type

Action· Medium

Update cladding specification and reissue elevations with the zinc panel module.

The specification pages and elevation drawings still reference the earlier, unconfirmed cladding option.

Recommendation

Complete before the next design-stage submission.

High confidence

Source
We need the spec and elevations updated to match what was actually approved.
Action· Medium

Send updated loading diagrams to the structural engineer for mezzanine tie-in sign-off.

Follows on from the structural engineer's earlier commitment to check mezzanine loading feasibility.

Recommendation

Send before the next structural coordination call.

Moderate confidence

Source
I'll get the updated loading diagrams over so structure can sign off properly.
Commitments / Outcomes
1 item

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

Commitment

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

1 card · 1 type

Commitment· Medium

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

The structural engineer agreed to check whether the existing mezzanine can take the new stair connection.

Recommendation

Follow up if loading diagrams have not arrived before the next session.

High confidence

Source
I'll run the numbers on the existing mezzanine and confirm whether it can take the new stair.
Principles
1 item

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Evidence

3 cards

3 cards · 1 type

Design Intent· Medium

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The team agreed the new studio wing should not compete visually with the original pavilion building.

Recommendation

Use this as a filter for massing, material, and roofline decisions through the rest of the project.

High confidence

Source
This should feel like it was always meant to sit behind the pavilion, not next to it.
Design Intent· Low

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The zinc cladding choice was checked back against the earlier quiet-infrastructure intent and confirmed to support it.

Recommendation

Keep this principle as the standing filter for any later material or massing change.

High confidence

Source
Zinc still keeps this quiet next to the pavilion — that was the whole point.
Design Intent· Low

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Reaffirmed once more while reviewing the near-final façade package — still the project's standing design intent.

Recommendation

Hold this principle through construction detailing, not just concept design.

High confidence

Source
Whatever we decide on the facade, it still needs to defer to the pavilion — that hasn't changed.

Interrupts the current flow

Risks and unresolved questions sit here because they can interrupt the project's current direction.

Risks
1 item

South-facing curtain wall may still cause glare on the working studio floor without a shading strategy.

Evidence

3 cards

3 cards · 1 type

Risk· High

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

Early massing puts a full-height glazed wall on the south elevation, directly facing the main desks.

Recommendation

Model glare at midday and late afternoon before committing to the glazing extent.

Moderate confidence

Source
That much south glass right at desk height is going to be a problem by early afternoon.
Risk· High

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

The glare concern from the kickoff session was raised again — no shading strategy has been proposed yet.

Recommendation

Bring a shading concept to the next client-facing review.

Moderate confidence

Source
We still haven't solved the glazing glare from last time — it's still sitting there unresolved.
Risk· Critical

South-facing curtain wall may still cause glare on the working studio floor without a shading strategy.

Raised for a third time across three sessions — still no shading strategy has been proposed or approved.

Recommendation

Bring a shading concept to sign-off before the glazing package is finalized.

Moderate confidence

Source
This is the third time we've flagged the glare and we still don't have a shading answer.
Unresolved
1 item

Whether the ground-floor café use requires a separate accessible entrance is still being confirmed.

Clarification

Whether the ground-floor café use requires a separate accessible entrance is still being confirmed.

1 card · 1 type

Clarification· Medium

Whether the ground-floor café use requires a separate accessible entrance is still being confirmed.

A late-stage programme addition (a small ground-floor café) raised an access question not yet resolved with the client.

Recommendation

Confirm with the client and check against accessibility requirements before the next review.

Moderate confidence

Source
If the café's open to the public, does it need its own entrance separate from the studio?
Clarification · Concept Coordination Kickoff→ resolved

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

The same decision the conversation scene showed forming.

The structural feasibility check-in commitment to check mezzanine loading became a real facade and programme coordination review action: “Send updated loading diagrams to the structural engineer for mezzanine tie-in sign-off.

Still open · Facade and Programme Coordination Review

More studio floor vs. Larger review space

Conversations disappear.
Project memory compounds.

Project Memory

Every session adds to the record instead of replacing it.

Source evidence

Nothing without evidence.

Every structured finding can lead back to the conversation that created it.

Decision
High

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

Structural sign-off closes the question first raised at the concept kickoff — the direct connection is feasible.

Decision

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

1 card · 1 type

Decision· High

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

Structural sign-off closes the question first raised at the concept kickoff — the direct connection is feasible.

Recommendation

Carry the confirmed stair position into the next set of coordinated drawings.

High confidence

Source
Structure's confirmed — the stair can land directly on the existing mezzanine, no extra steel needed.
Real component · click to inspect the source
Source quote

"Structure's confirmed — the stair can land directly on the…"

Session context

Facade and Programme Coordination Review · March 24, 2026

Confidence

High confidence

Ambiguity, preserved

Some project questions stay open.
ILM remembers that too.

When evidence genuinely pulls in two directions, The Intent Ledger keeps both positions visible instead of inventing a tidy conclusion.

Active Tension

Where evidence in this conversation pulls in two directions.

1 item

More studio floor

We use that floor every single day — I don't want to give up more of it than we have to.

Larger review space

Every client review we're squeezed into a corner — we actually need a proper space for this.

Leaning Larger review space

Evidence

2 cards

2 cards · 2 types

Design Intent· Medium

Studio floor area should stay maximized for daily practice use.

Several team members pushed back on giving up more floor area to a shared review space.

Moderate confidence

Source
We use that floor every single day — I don't want to give up more of it than we have to.
Clarification· Medium

A larger shared review space is needed for client presentations and critique.

Others argued the current review space is too small for client-facing presentations and pin-ups.

Moderate confidence

Source
Every client review we're squeezed into a corner — we actually need a proper space for this.
Still open · not forced to a conclusion
Persisting in Project Memory
Keep the disagreement — keep the evidence

Who it’s for

Built for the moments where design decisions get lost.

01 · Design Students

Design direction shifts after every critique, and the reasoning behind it is easy to lose by the next one.

ILM keeps the design principle and the critique that shaped it, connected across every review.

Design Intent

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The team agreed the new studio wing should not compete visually with the original pavilion building.

Design Intent

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

1 card · 1 type

Design Intent· Medium

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The team agreed the new studio wing should not compete visually with the original pavilion building.

Recommendation

Use this as a filter for massing, material, and roofline decisions through the rest of the project.

High confidence

Source
This should feel like it was always meant to sit behind the pavilion, not next to it.

02 · Junior Designers

Coordination calls produce commitments, actions, and risks that are easy to lose track of between sessions.

ILM keeps commitments, actions, and the risks behind them tied to the conversation that produced them.

Risk

South-facing curtain wall may still cause glare on the working studio floor without a shading strategy.

Raised for a third time across three sessions — still no shading strategy has been proposed or approved.

Risk

South-facing curtain wall may still cause glare on the working studio floor without a shading strategy.

1 card · 1 type

Risk· Critical

South-facing curtain wall may still cause glare on the working studio floor without a shading strategy.

Raised for a third time across three sessions — still no shading strategy has been proposed or approved.

Recommendation

Bring a shading concept to sign-off before the glazing package is finalized.

Moderate confidence

Source
This is the third time we've flagged the glare and we still don't have a shading answer.

03 · Design Studios

Client decisions and approvals get scattered across meetings, emails, and messages.

ILM turns client conversations into a shared, dated record the whole studio can return to.

Decision

Pre-weathered zinc confirmed as the primary cladding material.

The client reviewed both options and confirmed zinc, resolving the earlier cladding contradiction.

Decision

Pre-weathered zinc confirmed as the primary cladding material.

1 card · 1 type

Decision· High

Pre-weathered zinc confirmed as the primary cladding material.

The client reviewed both options and confirmed zinc, resolving the earlier cladding contradiction.

Recommendation

Reissue elevations and specification pages with the confirmed zinc panel module.

High confidence

Source
Let's go with the zinc — that's the one we actually approved.

Whichever of these is you, The Intent Ledger is available to start on today.

From our launch campaign

A real, public-facing product.

Early access · field testing

Tested with early design teams and students.

01
Source-backed

Every finding can be traced to the reviewed conversation that produced it.

02
Nothing invented

The system does not fabricate a project narrative — only what was actually said.

03
Inspectable

Important findings can be opened and checked against their exact source.

04
Ambiguity preserved

Open issues stay open when they're genuinely unresolved, instead of being tidied away.

05
No credit card to start

The first 3 ILM Records are free.

See it with your own project.

Access

Start with one real conversation.

01Real conversation

Okay, let's start with the stair — did structure get back to us on the mezzanine tie-in?

03ILM Record
Meeting Focus
Current Direction
Active Tension
Attention
Next Moves
04Project Memory

Read the map from left to right: project context → direction and decisions → delivery and actions → commitments and outcomes.

Project Memory

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Design Intent

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

1 card · 1 type

Design Intent· Low

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Reaffirmed once more while reviewing the near-final façade package — still the project's standing design intent.

Recommendation

Hold this principle through construction detailing, not just concept design.

High confidence

Source
Whatever we decide on the facade, it still needs to defer to the pavilion — that hasn't changed.
Direction & Decisions
3 items

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

Evidence

3 cards

3 cards · 1 type

Decision· High

Extend along the eastern riverbank edge rather than infill the courtyard.

The client confirmed the expansion should run along the river edge, keeping the existing courtyard open.

Recommendation

Update the site plan and massing study to reflect the eastern-edge footprint.

High confidence

Source
Let's keep the courtyard as it is and push the new studio along the river edge instead.
Decision· High

Pre-weathered zinc confirmed as the primary cladding material.

The client reviewed both options and confirmed zinc, resolving the earlier cladding contradiction.

Recommendation

Reissue elevations and specification pages with the confirmed zinc panel module.

High confidence

Source
Let's go with the zinc — that's the one we actually approved.
Decision· High

New stair confirmed to connect directly into the existing mezzanine.

Structural sign-off closes the question first raised at the concept kickoff — the direct connection is feasible.

Recommendation

Carry the confirmed stair position into the next set of coordinated drawings.

High confidence

Source
Structure's confirmed — the stair can land directly on the existing mezzanine, no extra steel needed.
Delivery / Actions
2 items

Update cladding specification and reissue elevations with the zinc panel module.

Evidence

2 cards

2 cards · 1 type

Action· Medium

Update cladding specification and reissue elevations with the zinc panel module.

The specification pages and elevation drawings still reference the earlier, unconfirmed cladding option.

Recommendation

Complete before the next design-stage submission.

High confidence

Source
We need the spec and elevations updated to match what was actually approved.
Action· Medium

Send updated loading diagrams to the structural engineer for mezzanine tie-in sign-off.

Follows on from the structural engineer's earlier commitment to check mezzanine loading feasibility.

Recommendation

Send before the next structural coordination call.

Moderate confidence

Source
I'll get the updated loading diagrams over so structure can sign off properly.
Commitments / Outcomes
1 item

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

Commitment

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

1 card · 1 type

Commitment· Medium

Structural engineer to confirm loading feasibility for the mezzanine stair tie-in.

The structural engineer agreed to check whether the existing mezzanine can take the new stair connection.

Recommendation

Follow up if loading diagrams have not arrived before the next session.

High confidence

Source
I'll run the numbers on the existing mezzanine and confirm whether it can take the new stair.
Principles
1 item

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Evidence

3 cards

3 cards · 1 type

Design Intent· Medium

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The team agreed the new studio wing should not compete visually with the original pavilion building.

Recommendation

Use this as a filter for massing, material, and roofline decisions through the rest of the project.

High confidence

Source
This should feel like it was always meant to sit behind the pavilion, not next to it.
Design Intent· Low

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

The zinc cladding choice was checked back against the earlier quiet-infrastructure intent and confirmed to support it.

Recommendation

Keep this principle as the standing filter for any later material or massing change.

High confidence

Source
Zinc still keeps this quiet next to the pavilion — that was the whole point.
Design Intent· Low

The expansion should read as quiet infrastructure, deferring to the existing riverside pavilion.

Reaffirmed once more while reviewing the near-final façade package — still the project's standing design intent.

Recommendation

Hold this principle through construction detailing, not just concept design.

High confidence

Source
Whatever we decide on the facade, it still needs to defer to the pavilion — that hasn't changed.

Interrupts the current flow

Risks and unresolved questions sit here because they can interrupt the project's current direction.

Risks
1 item

South-facing curtain wall may still cause glare on the working studio floor without a shading strategy.

Evidence

3 cards

3 cards · 1 type

Risk· High

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

Early massing puts a full-height glazed wall on the south elevation, directly facing the main desks.

Recommendation

Model glare at midday and late afternoon before committing to the glazing extent.

Moderate confidence

Source
That much south glass right at desk height is going to be a problem by early afternoon.
Risk· High

South-facing curtain wall may cause glare on the working studio floor.

The glare concern from the kickoff session was raised again — no shading strategy has been proposed yet.

Recommendation

Bring a shading concept to the next client-facing review.

Moderate confidence

Source
We still haven't solved the glazing glare from last time — it's still sitting there unresolved.
Risk· Critical

South-facing curtain wall may still cause glare on the working studio floor without a shading strategy.

Raised for a third time across three sessions — still no shading strategy has been proposed or approved.

Recommendation

Bring a shading concept to sign-off before the glazing package is finalized.

Moderate confidence

Source
This is the third time we've flagged the glare and we still don't have a shading answer.
Unresolved
1 item

Whether the ground-floor café use requires a separate accessible entrance is still being confirmed.

Clarification

Whether the ground-floor café use requires a separate accessible entrance is still being confirmed.

1 card · 1 type

Clarification· Medium

Whether the ground-floor café use requires a separate accessible entrance is still being confirmed.

A late-stage programme addition (a small ground-floor café) raised an access question not yet resolved with the client.

Recommendation

Confirm with the client and check against accessibility requirements before the next review.

Moderate confidence

Source
If the café's open to the public, does it need its own entrance separate from the studio?

Your next real conversation could be the first entry in your record.

Pricing

Start free. Continue only when you need to.

Start · First Memory

Free

Free to start

3 ILM Records, one project. No credit card required.

Create my first 3 ILM Records free

Continue · Project Record

$29

One-time

One-time pack · 15 additional ILM Records. Never expires.

See ILM Record packs

Scale · Working Memory

$29/mo

Per month

20 ILM Records every month across up to 3 active projects.

See working memory plan

Your project already has the answers.
They are hidden in the conversations.

The Intent Ledger helps you preserve what changed, what was decided, why it mattered, and what must happen next.

Conversation
ILM Record
Project Memory